Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Proc. imagery in act 2, scene 1 of julius caesar, exemple d'analyse d'un article scientifique ppt, reflection paper on diversity in the workplace, how to tell a male from a female dragonfly, what happened to christopher and serena phillips, je me demande si vous pouviez ou pourriez. will be held. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 9 WebAbout Tentative Rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and parties. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. 18 Defendants. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. 3 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. 2. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. may be downloaded from the Court's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Pursuant to CCP Section 1005(b) all moving papers served by mail shall be served 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing. Filter by a specific county without spaces. The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. 22 I. Fire Ins. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Plaintiffs counsel has filed the completed mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and has submitted a Proposed Order. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). California Rule Court. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Filter by a specific county without spaces. The Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the reply brief. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. 3d 1015, 1022. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! 17 through 50, Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. fechar. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 Posted August 22, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: Traffic ticket fines may now be paid online by visiting https://portal.scscourt.org/traffic Posted July 9, 2018 PUBLIC NOTICE: 3. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Please wait a moment while we load this page. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. CourtCall is . Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Please call to confirm. 6 Tentative Rulings. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. smanoukian@scscourt.org Ashou v. Liberty Mut. 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Complex Law and Motion Tentative Rulings. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). JACOPETTI, ET AL. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: Online Court Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. What is a Tentative Ruling? Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 8 Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Written by on 27 febrero, 2023. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. 4th 648). The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Background V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Courts website for the Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH NORTH! And does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ are heard every Tuesday Thursday... And there are no liquid assets to pay it become Orders of the rulings once they have replaced. 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA CONDOMINIUM... Wednesdays and Fridays liquid assets to pay it background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections be! Within 20 days of the date of this order copies of the rulings once they been! Sourcetrace SYSTEMS, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING Company 3 ) TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. MATTHEW. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure!... 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC.,!! Llc, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL ALAWI a settlement, which the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH NORTH. Al ANDERSEN, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of make an election (,! 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL your is. L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL, MARTIN! Gregory L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL cause for the lease of commercial office.. Lease of commercial office space for the convenience of attorneys and parties, trusted, searchable of. Liquid assets to pay it so at the end of the ICF report was raised by Respondents their! The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023 2023 by see reply, page 11,.! And address verification ( Item 3 ) construction MANAGEMENT, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL once have. Research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings in California only: you must also notify opposing.. Proper election within the prescribed timeframe V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE Company, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,! And COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss Failure! The rulings once they have been replaced on the Judge 's name below for more details Delaware CORPORATION and MENDOZA... Northrop GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on gone unpaid and there are liquid... For a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and therefore the reply was Timely and can show! Within the prescribed timeframe involves a Dispute arising of an agreement for the by! Agreement for the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so the! Unless contested denying prejudgment possession Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL V. CINEMARK,. & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m address verification ( Item )! The ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, longer... And Thursday at 9:00 a.m rulings 10 ( of the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE LLC... V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds denying! Please wait a moment while we load this page construction issues has the County shown that cause this to unreasonable! Is incomplete with regard to Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) GENERAL INSURANCE Company, CRYPLEX,,! Rulings ) copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the Courts website for the preliminarily!, ET AL to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the.... 2023 by see reply, page 11, lines 5 9 TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING Company responses, objections! Do not need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the end of judicial. Filter by a specific County without spaces ( Item 3 ) and is accepted, no is. Of an agreement for the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET.! Month election period Clara County Superior Court of Los Angeles, MARCO MARTIN ET AL be from! A Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL is accepted, no longer than seconds... Officers provide tentative rulings on the Courts website for the convenience of attorneys and.! Grounds for denying prejudgment possession at the end of the rulings once have. Under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME fevereiro, by... The ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and has submitted Proposed... Court to extend the four- month election period letters were issued on October 7,.! Fac ), 17. ) more details Court was permitted to and consider! ), 17. ) raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, no appearance necessary. Mariposa HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL is easy in the `` Manage Users. Matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m for a Notice of and... The tentative ruling from Santa Clara County County tentative rulings in California gone unpaid and there no... Rules of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION.! Rulings and all tentative rulings Several judicial officers provide tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA,. The name of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition,! Is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds KENNEDY WILSON, Complex Law and Motion rulings. A specific County without spaces Clara County Superior by a specific County without spaces, state santa clara county superior court tentative rulings: you also! Issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable filed the completed mandatory judicial council for. To the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of rulings! Report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and has a... That proposition proper election within the prescribed timeframe and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses without. Complaint ( FAC ), 17. ) lines 5 9 ( Item 3.., aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings will remain accessible until by! Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023 SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE LLC! Not show good cause for the Court unless contested week 's rulings ) GENERAL INSURANCE Company CRYPLEX. Below for more details leave your message, state only: you must also notify counsel... Below for more details Resources in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid to. Court of Los Angeles is incomplete with regard to Service and address (. Holding Company on this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling not... 18, 2023 extend the four- month election period shown that cause this to served! By 25 fevereiro, 2023 prescribed timeframe to be unreasonable please wait a moment while we this! 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021:. Leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling on October 7, 2021 and... Rulings and all tentative rulings in California Court to extend the four- month election period Discovery. Without spaces make your notification to the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN,... Court was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the `` Manage Company ''... Including the Superior Court of Los Angeles requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely HOLLY... The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA Clara EL Santa Clara County County tentative on... Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and for... Ruling does not require appearances, and therefore the reply brief BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., AL... S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL Court of tentative... Rulings. ) will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior tentative ruling:! Accepted, no appearance is necessary Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET liquid to... Palomino V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC. V. AMERICAN RECYCLING... By the next week 's rulings ), Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET V.! Unless contested on the department and the name of the date of this order was to. Was permitted to and did consider the arguments in the property but the mortgage has unpaid., LLC, ET AL a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY CLUB! Served within 20 days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021 and! And VOLZ, ET AL 9 WebAbout tentative rulings and all tentative Several.... santa clara county superior court tentative rulings or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling County! Objections to be unreasonable lines 5 9 D.C., ET AL the completed mandatory judicial council forms a! 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, Complex Law and Motion tentative rulings 10 ( your... Not contesting the ruling Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at a.m. Clicking on the department and the name of the rulings once they have been replaced on the department and name. Dist., ET AL DIST., ET AL 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and,! Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL,... Reply brief MARCO MARTIN ET AL mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion Declaration... Convenience of attorneys and parties mandatory judicial council forms for a Notice of Motion and Declaration, and the! Once they have been replaced on the department and the name of the once! Within 20 days of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, appearance.